Skip to main content

Practical astronomy - what kind of instruments to use

Once we've decided on a place for the observatory and decided on whether we want it to be a wide-field telescope or a deep-field telescope, we will have to decide on the array of instruments to be setup. Again, depending on what our intentions are with the telescopes, the objects that we would like to observe, we will have to decide on a relevant telescope.

For example, if we intend to observe transient events such as asteroids, comets and supernovae, we will need a wide-field telescope. Why, you ask? Well, a transient event, by definition, is an event that wasn't observed at the same place at an earlier time. As such, supernovae are stars that blow up and asteroids move faster than any of the stars do, from our point of view. Therefore, if we observe the same patch of sky for a very long period of time, we are bound to run into interesting transient events. And since there isn't any special direction or patch in the sky, wide-field telescopes are designed such that they can map the whole sky once a week. Again, note that when i mean whole sky, I mean the portion of the sky visible to a ground based telescope. Similarly, if we intend to study astronomical objects to a good angular resolution, we deploy a deep-field telescope with a camera (CCD) containing a large number of pixels, with small width.

Going off track, in the 50's and 60's, before CCDs were developed and widely deployed for astronomical purposes, photographic plates were the choice of an astronomer. A photographic plate would be placed at the focal place to capture the sky and would then be studied to understand the objects in the field of view. Interestingly, some of them are being digitized by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. This could help in discovering new transient or variable objects. But photometric plates are highly restrictive in the sense that it's a qualitative study of the objects and not a quantitative one. Relative brightness can be inferred by using a reference star in the frame and angular distribution but information about other properties such as temperature, composition cannot be inferred from the plates. Inorder to overcome this obstacle, astronomers used filters. Filters would be placed infront of the photographic plates, filters that restrict the light falling on the plates. There are numerous astronomical filters, a brief overview of which can be found here. The filters restrict the spectrum of light that falls on, and hence absorbed by, the plate. Recall that a stars can be considered as blackbodies and the spectrum of a star can be studied, albeit qualitatively, using such filters. For example, in the case of two stars A & B observed using a U filter (365 nm), if one A is brighter than B, we can infer that the temperature of A is greater than that of B. This inference comes from the understanding that with increasing temperature, an increasing amount of the star's radiated energy falls in the U band. While not obvious, such qualitative analysis has in fact given incredible results, the most prominent of which is the HR diagram. The HR diagram depicts the types of stars and it can be used to understand the evolution of stars and to infer the distance to star clusters or other galaxies. Photometric redshifts is another interesting use of studying astronomical objects with filters. The replacement of photographic plates by CCDs just made field more quantitative.

Popular posts from this blog

Animation using GNUPlot

Animation using GNUPlotI've been trying to create an animation depicting a quasar spectrum moving across the 5 SDSS pass bands with respect to redshift. It is important to visualise what emission lines are moving in and out of bands to be able to understand the color-redshift plots and the changes in it.
I've tried doing this using the animate function in matplotlib, python but i wasn't able to make it work - meaning i worked on it for a couple of days and then i gave up, not having found solutions for my problems on the internet.
And then i came across this site, where the gunn-peterson trough and the lyman alpha forest have been depicted - in a beautiful manner. And this got me interested in using js and d3 to do the animations and make it dynamic - using sliders etc.
In the meanwhile, i thought i'd look up and see if there was a way to create animations in gnuplot and whoopdedoo, what do i find but nirvana!

In the image, you see 5 static curves and one dynam…

on MOOCs.

For those of you who don't know, MOOC stands for Massively Open Online Course.

The internet is an awesome thing. It's making education free for all. Well, mostly free. But it's surprising at the width and depth of courses being offered online. And it looks like they are also having an impact on students, especially those from universities that are not top ranked. Students in all parts of the world can now get a first class education experience, thanks to courses offered by Stanford, MIT, Caltech, etc.

I'm talking about MOOCs because one of my new year resolutions is to take online courses, atleast 2 per semester (6 months). And I've chosen the following two courses on edX - Analyzing Big Data with Microsoft R Server and Data Science Essentials for now. I looked at courses on Coursera but I couldn't find any which was worthy and free. There are a lot more MOOC providers out there but let's start here. And I feel like the two courses are relevant to where I …

On programmers.

I just watched this brilliant keynote today. It's a commentary on Programmers and the software development industry/ecosystem as a whole.



I am not going to give you a tl;dr version of the talk because it is a talk that I believe everyone should watch, that everyone should learn from. Instead, I am going to give my own parallel-ish views on programmers and programming.
As pointed out in the talk, there are mythical creatures in the software development industry who are revered as gods. Guido Van Rossum, the creator of Python, was given the title Benevolent Dictator For Life (BDFL). People flock around the creators of popular languages or libraries. They are god-like to most programmers and are treated like gods. By which, I mean to say, we assume they don't have flaws. That they are infallible. That they are perfect.
And alongside this belief in the infallibility of these Gods, we believe that they were born programmers. That programming is something that people are born wit…