Skip to main content

Gravitational lensing and CMB photons

I wanted answers to two questions at the beginning of the semester, both of which are related to general relativity and cosmology. Both of the questions are related to gravitational lensing, a phenomenon where light bends around massive objects. Gravitational lensing was one of the predictions of Einstein's General theory of relativity and was observed during a solar eclipse.

The first of my questions is related to how distant galaxies are lensed by galaxy clusters in our line of sight. Conventional optics governs that if two sources of light are placed behind one another, the farther one will be obscured by the closer one. General relativity, on the other hand, allows for light emitted by the distant source to get bent around the closer source to reach us. It has been observed to happen that multiple images of the distant galaxy are formed due to a lens in the line of sight. Einstein's cross is one such example. Now, having covered the topics of curvature and geodesics in the course on general relativity and cosmology, I want to understand the equations that govern bending of light and I want to learn how to model the lens given the number of images observed or how to understand the images given a lens model.

Secondly, I want(ed) to know if CMB photons are lensed by galaxy clusters too. Galaxy clusters give raise to some interesting phenomenon, such as the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect, which is an inverse compton effect. I wanted to know if such CMB photons would also be effected in such a fashion. And apparently they do. SPT, ACT and now Planck have released data sets pertaining to lensing of CMB photons by massive clusters. I'd like to dig a bit deeper into this to understand exactly how this is quantified, at various angular scales.

While searching for literature on the CMB lensing, I came across another interesting effect on CMB due to clusters. One can imagine galaxy clusters as potential wells or potential hills through which the CMB photons have to pass. In a static world, a photon would have the same energy before and after the cluster/well/hill but because we live in an expanding world, there is a slight difference in energy before and after the well/hill. This is referred to as the Sachs-Wolfe effect.

The more I dig, the more it seems that astronomy (technically cosmology) gets really interesting on the extremely large scales.

Popular posts from this blog

Animation using GNUPlot

Animation using GNUPlotI've been trying to create an animation depicting a quasar spectrum moving across the 5 SDSS pass bands with respect to redshift. It is important to visualise what emission lines are moving in and out of bands to be able to understand the color-redshift plots and the changes in it.
I've tried doing this using the animate function in matplotlib, python but i wasn't able to make it work - meaning i worked on it for a couple of days and then i gave up, not having found solutions for my problems on the internet.
And then i came across this site, where the gunn-peterson trough and the lyman alpha forest have been depicted - in a beautiful manner. And this got me interested in using js and d3 to do the animations and make it dynamic - using sliders etc.
In the meanwhile, i thought i'd look up and see if there was a way to create animations in gnuplot and whoopdedoo, what do i find but nirvana!

In the image, you see 5 static curves and one dynam…

on MOOCs.

For those of you who don't know, MOOC stands for Massively Open Online Course.

The internet is an awesome thing. It's making education free for all. Well, mostly free. But it's surprising at the width and depth of courses being offered online. And it looks like they are also having an impact on students, especially those from universities that are not top ranked. Students in all parts of the world can now get a first class education experience, thanks to courses offered by Stanford, MIT, Caltech, etc.

I'm talking about MOOCs because one of my new year resolutions is to take online courses, atleast 2 per semester (6 months). And I've chosen the following two courses on edX - Analyzing Big Data with Microsoft R Server and Data Science Essentials for now. I looked at courses on Coursera but I couldn't find any which was worthy and free. There are a lot more MOOC providers out there but let's start here. And I feel like the two courses are relevant to where I …

On programmers.

I just watched this brilliant keynote today. It's a commentary on Programmers and the software development industry/ecosystem as a whole.



I am not going to give you a tl;dr version of the talk because it is a talk that I believe everyone should watch, that everyone should learn from. Instead, I am going to give my own parallel-ish views on programmers and programming.
As pointed out in the talk, there are mythical creatures in the software development industry who are revered as gods. Guido Van Rossum, the creator of Python, was given the title Benevolent Dictator For Life (BDFL). People flock around the creators of popular languages or libraries. They are god-like to most programmers and are treated like gods. By which, I mean to say, we assume they don't have flaws. That they are infallible. That they are perfect.
And alongside this belief in the infallibility of these Gods, we believe that they were born programmers. That programming is something that people are born wit…