An obsession

I don't have anything new to add so i am going to write about an obsession of mine. Almost an year back, I was at IIST Trivandrum working with Prof. Anand Narayanan on Quasars. It was my first serious summer project on astronomy and i was having a fun time learning about quasars and working with python and sql query. I was asked to reproduce the results of the richards et al. 2001 paper but as I eventually learnt, it was getting harder and harder to find the original data set. So, instead of reproducing the results from the original data set, I intended to extend the results to a new data set - the data for quasars from the SDSS DR9. The original data set in question was put together using quasars from the SDSS DR3 and other surveys. As i reproduced the results for the new (much larger) data set, weird artifacts started popping up in the results. As i dug deeper, I found that these artifacts were grouped in red-shift space and in coordinate space. Further, when i looked at the spectra for these objects, they looked nothing like those of quasars. Either their SNR was too low or the spectra looked more like that of late-M type stars. I kept dugging up digital sky survey and SDSS images for the portion of sky where these objects were grouped and went through my data analysis one more time to be sure i didn't make any mistakes. Eventually, I mailed Prof. Richards with my data set and doubts I had. He replied saying that the pipeline which identifies quasars from the SDSS data is (ofcourse) not perfect (DUH!) and if I wanted a data set which was only quasars, I should use either Schender et al. 2010 or Paris et al. 2014 which were checked and cleared of such artifacts which could've crept through the SDSS pipeline. I spent close to two months on this only to come at the conclusion that I should've used a more refined data set and not the crude one. I wouldn't say that the time spent was a complete waste because i got better at python. The data set is available as a github repository here and you can look at my previous blog posts on this topic from June and July 2013 for more on quasars and my work.

21:00:30 - 21:19:00

Popular posts from this blog

Farewell to Enthought

I started my professional career at Enthought , at the Pune office in India, on Feb 29, 2016. Over the course of eight long years, I spent time at the Austin office in the US, the Cambridge office in the UK, and I worked remotely from India. I was let go on March 27, 2024 . I had an unbelievably great time. I had three amazing mentors - Pankaj Pandey, Senganal Thirunavukkarasu, and Mark Dickinson. Pankaj mentored me in my first year at Enthought. I started paying attention to the craft of software after working with him. Senganal started mentoring me in my second year at Enthought, and continues to mentor me, even after the both of us have moved on from Enthought. He instilled professionalism in me, ensuring that the code I wrote produced precise scientific results, and that I tackled the known unknown aspects of a project first, to ensure timely communication about project progress. I was eager to manage people at the time and Senganal made me realize that I didn't want to manage ...
Read more

Arxiv author affiliations using Python

So, I wanted to get author affiliation information from papers on arXiv. arXiv provides with an API to bulk query their database and get information. Following that, I look for the attribute 'arxiv:affiliation' in the html data. Here's the code - import urllib from BeautifulSoup import BeautifulStoneSoup   url = 'http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:astro&start=0&max_results=1000'   data = urllib.urlopen(url).read() soup = BeautifulStoneSoup(data) #print(soup.prettify()) #list = soup.findAll('arxiv:affiliation') #for i in range(len(list)): #        print list[i].contents   test = [tag.string for tag in soup.findAll('arxiv:aiffiliation')] Now, the problem I'm having is that I'm getting affiliation of all authors which I want to split into sets of affiliations of authors of a paper, which I'm stuck on at the moment. Once I get that part, I can move on to the next part of this pet project, displaying these...
Read more

Elementary (particle physics), my dear Watson

Ground Control to Major Tom:  Shruti Patel checking in. Since my dear friend and fellow-physicist Rahul Poruri is homeward bound, and shall remain there for a week, I'm stepping in to continue his tradition of daily posts to Astronut . Even as I write, I'm not quite sure what this post is going to be about, so please forgive me for occasional rants and digressions.  By the way Rahul, I totally resent you for the name of this blog- I'm never going to start my own blog because there's no way I'll come up with a name as cool as Astronut! For now, I shall try and be happy with being a guest writer! Before I begin, a little bit on who I am and what I do; so that you can trust that my general views on science- particle physics in particular- are not entirely baseless. I graduated with a masters in Physics from IIT Madras in July this year, and I'm currently working towards (an eventual) PhD with the Theory Group at the Deutsches Electronen-Synchrotron (DESY)...
Read more