arXiv : "A Zoo of Galaxies" by Karen L. Masters

"A Zoo of Galaxies" by Karen L. Masters is a good place to start for an amateur astronomer interested in contributing to astronomy. The author discusses the Morphology of Galaxies and human efforts over the last couple of decades in classifying the galaxies.

Our understanding of the universe and our milky way galaxy in general have changed over the last couple of decades
- from thinking that earth was the center of the universe to understanding that the earth revolves around the sun,
- from thinking that sun was the center of the galaxy to realizing that the sun was ~8 kpc away from the center of the milkyway galaxy and
- from thinking that the bright objects and halos visible in the night sky belong to our galaxy to understanding that the our galaxy is just one of the many galaxies visible in the night sky, that galaxies interact with each other, move in clusters, collide with each other, and it's all for us to see, understand and observe in awe.

On the journey towards understanding galaxies and the universe, we've tried classifying the galaxies. Classification is a stepping stone in looking for certain characteristics related to the morphology of the galaxy. A rudimentary classification was put forward by Hubble, visualized as -


where E refers to Elliptical galaxies, S refers to Spiral galaxies and SB refers to Barred Spiral galaxies. The number suffixed in the case of E galaxies corresponds to the ellipticity of the galaxy observed and the alphabet suffixed in the case of S & SB galaxies serves the same purpose.

This basic morphological classification of galaxies actually reveals information regarding the age of the galaxy - spiral galaxies are thought to be younger in comparision to elliptical galaxies, whose ellipticity/distortion is attributed to violent galactic interactions, irregular galaxies being the extreme case.

Though morphological classification is a good start, it is hard to automate this process and results obtained through automation haven't been satisfactory. Manual classification by scientists takes (obviously) a large chunk of time that could otherwise be spent being more productive.

This is where the Galaxy Zoo and Zooniverse projects come in. These are community supported projects where in the catalogs are shared with the public and those motivated can contribute to the project by helping with the classification. This has been a resounding success, you can look at the scientific outcome of the galaxy zoo in detail in the paper mentioned.

For those of you interested in contributing to the scientific community in one way or the other, you should seriously consider contributing through the Galaxy Zoo or the Zooniverse projects. 

Popular posts from this blog

Animation using GNUPlot

Arxiv author affiliations using Python

Thoughts on the National Deep Tech Startup Policy