arXiv : "A Zoo of Galaxies" by Karen L. Masters

"A Zoo of Galaxies" by Karen L. Masters is a good place to start for an amateur astronomer interested in contributing to astronomy. The author discusses the Morphology of Galaxies and human efforts over the last couple of decades in classifying the galaxies.

Our understanding of the universe and our milky way galaxy in general have changed over the last couple of decades
- from thinking that earth was the center of the universe to understanding that the earth revolves around the sun,
- from thinking that sun was the center of the galaxy to realizing that the sun was ~8 kpc away from the center of the milkyway galaxy and
- from thinking that the bright objects and halos visible in the night sky belong to our galaxy to understanding that the our galaxy is just one of the many galaxies visible in the night sky, that galaxies interact with each other, move in clusters, collide with each other, and it's all for us to see, understand and observe in awe.

On the journey towards understanding galaxies and the universe, we've tried classifying the galaxies. Classification is a stepping stone in looking for certain characteristics related to the morphology of the galaxy. A rudimentary classification was put forward by Hubble, visualized as -


where E refers to Elliptical galaxies, S refers to Spiral galaxies and SB refers to Barred Spiral galaxies. The number suffixed in the case of E galaxies corresponds to the ellipticity of the galaxy observed and the alphabet suffixed in the case of S & SB galaxies serves the same purpose.

This basic morphological classification of galaxies actually reveals information regarding the age of the galaxy - spiral galaxies are thought to be younger in comparision to elliptical galaxies, whose ellipticity/distortion is attributed to violent galactic interactions, irregular galaxies being the extreme case.

Though morphological classification is a good start, it is hard to automate this process and results obtained through automation haven't been satisfactory. Manual classification by scientists takes (obviously) a large chunk of time that could otherwise be spent being more productive.

This is where the Galaxy Zoo and Zooniverse projects come in. These are community supported projects where in the catalogs are shared with the public and those motivated can contribute to the project by helping with the classification. This has been a resounding success, you can look at the scientific outcome of the galaxy zoo in detail in the paper mentioned.

For those of you interested in contributing to the scientific community in one way or the other, you should seriously consider contributing through the Galaxy Zoo or the Zooniverse projects. 

Popular posts from this blog

Arxiv author affiliations using Python

So, I wanted to get author affiliation information from papers on arXiv. arXiv provides with an API to bulk query their database and get information. Following that, I look for the attribute 'arxiv:affiliation' in the html data. Here's the code - import urllib from BeautifulSoup import BeautifulStoneSoup   url = 'http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=all:astro&start=0&max_results=1000'   data = urllib.urlopen(url).read() soup = BeautifulStoneSoup(data) #print(soup.prettify()) #list = soup.findAll('arxiv:affiliation') #for i in range(len(list)): #        print list[i].contents   test = [tag.string for tag in soup.findAll('arxiv:aiffiliation')] Now, the problem I'm having is that I'm getting affiliation of all authors which I want to split into sets of affiliations of authors of a paper, which I'm stuck on at the moment. Once I get that part, I can move on to the next part of this pet project, displaying these
Read more

Farewell to Enthought

I started my professional career at Enthought , at the Pune office in India, on Feb 29, 2016. Over the course of eight long years, I spent time at the Austin office in the US, the Cambridge office in the UK, and I worked remotely from India. I was let go on March 27, 2024 . I had an unbelievably great time. I had three amazing mentors - Pankaj Pandey, Senganal Thirunavukkarasu, and Mark Dickinson. Pankaj mentored me in my first year at Enthought. I started paying attention to the craft of software after working with him. Senganal started mentoring me in my second year at Enthought, and continues to mentor me, even after the both of us have moved on from Enthought. He instilled professionalism in me, ensuring that the code I wrote produced precise scientific results, and that I tackled the known unknown aspects of a project first, to ensure timely communication about project progress. I was eager to manage people at the time and Senganal made me realize that I didn't want to manage
Read more

Elementary (particle physics), my dear Watson

Ground Control to Major Tom:  Shruti Patel checking in. Since my dear friend and fellow-physicist Rahul Poruri is homeward bound, and shall remain there for a week, I'm stepping in to continue his tradition of daily posts to Astronut . Even as I write, I'm not quite sure what this post is going to be about, so please forgive me for occasional rants and digressions.  By the way Rahul, I totally resent you for the name of this blog- I'm never going to start my own blog because there's no way I'll come up with a name as cool as Astronut! For now, I shall try and be happy with being a guest writer! Before I begin, a little bit on who I am and what I do; so that you can trust that my general views on science- particle physics in particular- are not entirely baseless. I graduated with a masters in Physics from IIT Madras in July this year, and I'm currently working towards (an eventual) PhD with the Theory Group at the Deutsches Electronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
Read more