Skip to main content

2 n 1/2 men is now 1 n 1/2 men with a zombie, which acts really bad

i was thinking of  blogging on this matter before i watched the new season of 2n1/2men with ashton kutcher replacing charlie sheen as the lead in the tv series. it can be summed up as 8 seasons of awesomeness followed by a stupid interview which made chuck lorre chuck charlie from the lead part, kill him by throwing himself infront of a train in the tv show and take ashton kutcher as his replacement.

i never bothered for the acting because the comedy was just briliant, the script was awesome and charlie was just perfect for the part. but why do you think after 8 seasons of charlie acting as himself in the tv series finally rant on his producer chuck lorre. well i have a theory.

ALLEN

from the very first episode, allen is shown as a loser and though you might have pity towards him, pity almost at the end of every episode, that pity is almost always overcome by the huge laughter following it. as for charlie, he had no problem acting as the real life him for 8 seasons. but the cane the episodes 8-15, 16 where allen starts acting like a multiple personality, one of which is the same old allen we've seen for 8 years and one new allen, who is sinister, crazy, awesome and seemingly very interesting. and just when i was hoping for more of allen, just when i was thinking that the script was finally gonna work for the good of allen, charlie rants, he's fired and now wer're back to the 9th seaon which itself starts with allen returning back to his original, crappy self.

so, i wonder why charlie ranted when he did. he didnt have any problems acting what he was in real life for 8 years and then suddenly one day he just gets up and rants. and c'mon, if you say that charlie had saturated from the bullshit from his producer and ranted, that is in now way true. charlie is the cool dude, who cant be pissed off. bu im pretty sure he'll be pissed if he was made the side plot in a tv show which started with him as the lead, which has 8 seasons worth of following behind it, which may in itself be becasue of his name. that is what i think happened, once charlie realised that the script was changing, not for his sake but to finally bring some shades of red in allen, maybe bring allen into the lime light and saw how the audience responded to these changes, he freaked out. well he is already high(most of the time), how hard is it to get him syked about something.

so, maybe he freaked out for the sake of his character, maybe he freaked out at the prospect of him not being the lead of a tv show which started on him and his life. maybe now im high and i have no idea what im telling you. i dont know (neither will you) . so, yeah.
was the script of 2 n 1/2 men about to change for the better of allen, we will never know. did charlie freak out because of the changes around him, supposedly purported against him, we will never know. will we ever be able to like charlie's replacement on the show, we never know. will the script change towards allen again, lets hope so.

Popular posts from this blog

Animation using GNUPlot

Animation using GNUPlotI've been trying to create an animation depicting a quasar spectrum moving across the 5 SDSS pass bands with respect to redshift. It is important to visualise what emission lines are moving in and out of bands to be able to understand the color-redshift plots and the changes in it.
I've tried doing this using the animate function in matplotlib, python but i wasn't able to make it work - meaning i worked on it for a couple of days and then i gave up, not having found solutions for my problems on the internet.
And then i came across this site, where the gunn-peterson trough and the lyman alpha forest have been depicted - in a beautiful manner. And this got me interested in using js and d3 to do the animations and make it dynamic - using sliders etc.
In the meanwhile, i thought i'd look up and see if there was a way to create animations in gnuplot and whoopdedoo, what do i find but nirvana!

In the image, you see 5 static curves and one dynam…

on MOOCs.

For those of you who don't know, MOOC stands for Massively Open Online Course.

The internet is an awesome thing. It's making education free for all. Well, mostly free. But it's surprising at the width and depth of courses being offered online. And it looks like they are also having an impact on students, especially those from universities that are not top ranked. Students in all parts of the world can now get a first class education experience, thanks to courses offered by Stanford, MIT, Caltech, etc.

I'm talking about MOOCs because one of my new year resolutions is to take online courses, atleast 2 per semester (6 months). And I've chosen the following two courses on edX - Analyzing Big Data with Microsoft R Server and Data Science Essentials for now. I looked at courses on Coursera but I couldn't find any which was worthy and free. There are a lot more MOOC providers out there but let's start here. And I feel like the two courses are relevant to where I …

On programmers.

I just watched this brilliant keynote today. It's a commentary on Programmers and the software development industry/ecosystem as a whole.



I am not going to give you a tl;dr version of the talk because it is a talk that I believe everyone should watch, that everyone should learn from. Instead, I am going to give my own parallel-ish views on programmers and programming.
As pointed out in the talk, there are mythical creatures in the software development industry who are revered as gods. Guido Van Rossum, the creator of Python, was given the title Benevolent Dictator For Life (BDFL). People flock around the creators of popular languages or libraries. They are god-like to most programmers and are treated like gods. By which, I mean to say, we assume they don't have flaws. That they are infallible. That they are perfect.
And alongside this belief in the infallibility of these Gods, we believe that they were born programmers. That programming is something that people are born wit…